Although the reality was very thin, every woman must have looked in the mirror and then anxiously, "Do I look fat?". Do not rush to say it lebay, because the human brain is the body's own see 69 percent wider than the actual size.
Quoted from the Telegraph, Wednesday (06/16/2010), this phenomenon is revealed in research conducted by scientists at University College London. Believed, these findings can explain the causes of eating disorders like anorexia.
In that study, 18 volunteers were asked to invert the palm of his hand and then closed with a board. Then, from behind the boards that the volunteers were asked to estimate the location of 10 points and sections of the fingertips and then show it with the pointer.
The points shown were then compared with actual hand shapes and sizes. It turned out that these estimates form the size of 69 percent wider than the original. Similarly, long fingers, the volunteers estimated 27.9 percent on average shorter than the original.
Dr Matthew Longo who led the study said, estimating the error occurs in the subconscious and involve parts of the brain that perceives sizes. These sections make someone aware of the location of the body even with my eyes closed.
"Someone certainly recognize parts of his body, proved to be one of the volunteers did not recognize her own image even if made in various sizes. But in estimating the position, it does not apply," Dr Longo.
This effect becomes very visible in women, who tend to be sensitive to body size in certain parts such as stomach and hips. Experts peyakini this is closely related to anorexia.
"We know that patients with anorexia nervosa also experience disturbances in body imaging. They may feel fat, even though the reality was very thin," said Susan Ringwood from the Beat, a charity for anorexia.
Ringwood assess these findings could explain the conditions experienced by patients with anorexia are more rational. Feeling that her body is more fat is not simply a form of anxiety, but rather triggered by the natural perception in the brain.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
Many people have been asking the question What is the true nature of digital photography? for a long time. In fact, when people ask the question about the true nature of digital photography, they often mean to ask whether it is science.
Science – some people argue that science is the true nature of digital photography. One argument is that photography, unlike painting, actually comes from something existing and not from a painters mind or emotion. This can be very persuasive since, indeed, a photographer does not actually make photographs. He or she merely takes them.
Another argument regarding the scientific nature of digital photography is the fact that the editing that people do and adjustments that photographers make are based on a series of steps that can be narrowed down scientifically. People who argue for the scientific nature of digital photography may reason that the same series of steps can be taken in order to achieve the same results. There is a certain quality of constancy about digital photography that renders it a science.
But what is the true nature of digital photography? We have read the various arguments supporting science and art. There appears to be no solution to this question, right?
The true nature of digital photography will always remain to be a paradox. This means that though it can be considered as an art, it can also be considered as a science. When is the paradox of the nature of digital photography solved? Well, it is solved when a person takes a digital photograph.
The true nature of digital photography lies in the hands of the person who takes the pictures. The way a person treats the process defines the nature of digital photography for him or her. It is not absolutely art nor is it absolutely science. The true nature of digital photography is a paradox. It might seem to be contradictory, but it is somehow true.
Science – some people argue that science is the true nature of digital photography. One argument is that photography, unlike painting, actually comes from something existing and not from a painters mind or emotion. This can be very persuasive since, indeed, a photographer does not actually make photographs. He or she merely takes them.
Another argument regarding the scientific nature of digital photography is the fact that the editing that people do and adjustments that photographers make are based on a series of steps that can be narrowed down scientifically. People who argue for the scientific nature of digital photography may reason that the same series of steps can be taken in order to achieve the same results. There is a certain quality of constancy about digital photography that renders it a science.
But what is the true nature of digital photography? We have read the various arguments supporting science and art. There appears to be no solution to this question, right?
The true nature of digital photography will always remain to be a paradox. This means that though it can be considered as an art, it can also be considered as a science. When is the paradox of the nature of digital photography solved? Well, it is solved when a person takes a digital photograph.
The true nature of digital photography lies in the hands of the person who takes the pictures. The way a person treats the process defines the nature of digital photography for him or her. It is not absolutely art nor is it absolutely science. The true nature of digital photography is a paradox. It might seem to be contradictory, but it is somehow true.
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
We are now having more cool weather. It rained this weekend and its really pretty cool outside. This is what the old timers call Blackberry Winter. When the blackberries start to bloom there is nearly always some cool weather. I doubt if the weather really watches blackberry bushes to see when to produce cool weather, but it happens pretty much every year anyway. My wife and I have stayed inside most of the weekend. We got a lot of rest. I mowed the yard today but other than that I haven't done much. My wife has been playing an online game called Shaiya. She loves that game. I bought her some protection so she doesn't lose all of her won points every time her character dies. Our chickens are still eating their eggs. I intended to buy some golf balls to put in their nests to discourage them, but of course I forgot it. We are only getting a few eggs now. Unless we are standing right there when the egg is laid it will be eaten by the other chickens in a matter of seconds. We are pretty discouraged and disappointed because we have so much time and money invested in our chickens. They may end up being roasted or in soup or dumplings if they don't change their ways lol. Have a great week everyone!
Monday, June 7, 2010
My friends used to tell me that I do not know the value of money and I used to spend money in a lavish way. I never care a damn about their words. The only thing I feel sad is sometimes my friends used to talk behind my back. I cannot tolerate my close friends talking behind my back. My wife and my parents never encourage friends those who talk behind my back. my wife used to fire them in front of me if they talk behind my back.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Thursday, June 3, 2010
The good thing about nick my first son is he never listen to anyone but he will not open his mouth when my wife is at my place. My wife works for a Software company in my state and she is very sweet person. But only with my first son my wife is bit strict and she never allows him to talk in front of others.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Life is a roller coaster. It has a serious of unimaginable twists and twirls. There are numerous occasions in which one tends to act in a specified way. Several characteristics of a person are portrayed all through his life. Of all the characteristics I find the shyness as one of the most exotic attitude of the person. Shyness with members of the other sex is common among young people. Getting over self-consciousness to the point where one can relax and be friendly with those one most admires is a challenge. The more thrilled one is with the presence of the other person, the more likely one seems to be embarrassed, it seems. But with experience he/she gradually become more comfortable with the opposite sex. Then, as he/she develop poise and self-confidence, he/she discovers and put into practice more and more of the art of communicating. How to develop that poise and confidence is the question. Since girls grow up sooner, and are ready for dates before boys of their age and grade generally are, a particular problem for a teen-age girl is how to get a bashful boy to notice her. This is why girls' clubs so often center on planning boy-girl activities. Many a shy boy has come out of himself at a well-planned party. With encouragement he finds that he can carry on a conversation and have fun in a mixed group.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)